Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Democratic Dominoes Keep Falling in Virginia

Money Quote:

The Democratic Party of Virginia, like the Democratic Party nationally, has changed its ideology faster than it has changed its politicians. 

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/02/virginia-democratic-scandal-mark-herring-blackface-photo/582205/

Friday, January 4, 2019

A Less Violent 2018

Murders in New Orleans dropped last year.  In the "sanctuary city" of Los Angeles violent crime and murder are at 50 year lows. Same for San Francisco. Even famously dangerous Chicago saw a decrease in murders last year.

How is this happening? Well, certainly no credit to federal government. The DOJ under AG Sessions withheld police funds over "sanctuary cities."

These reductions are due to hard work by the local governments. Democrats Mitch Landrieu and LaToya Cantrell of New Orleans, Chicago's Rahm Emanuel, London Breed in San Francisco, and Los Angeles' Eric Garcetti deserve recognition.

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

So Liz Warren Wants to be President

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D - MA) is the first Democrat to announce her intention to run for the Presidency. On paper she has many of the qualities needed to address the ramshackle economic policies of the current administration - deep knowledge of the banking system, credit policy and a commitment to consumer protections. That's a fairly narrow band of expertise for a serious run at the White House, but she has time to develop her policy positions on other important issues.

I'm afraid, though, that well-developed ideas and proposals won't be sufficient for electoral success. As a nation we react poorly to viable female candidates. It's been said that part of Hillary Clinton's failure in 2016 was her attempt to run a "man-style" campaign. According to this theory, American women haven't yet figured out how to run for the Presidency as a woman.

And then there's bone-deep misogyny that helped the Trump campaign find success. It's going to be tough for any woman to deal with the culture's disdain for smart, determined, successful women. @ConnieSchultz gets it.





Sunday, September 13, 2015

This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things

From YouGov:
Republicans (43%) are more than twice as likely as Democrats (20%) to say that they could conceive of a situation in which they would support a military coup in the United States. Independents tend to say that they could not (38%) rather than could (29%) imagine supporting a coup.

Saturday, September 12, 2015

How Republicans Helped the Iran Deal

Jamelle Bouie has an interesting theory.
But for as much as the White House can justly gloat over its strategy for securing Senate support, we shouldn’t ignore the extent to which it had a huge ally in persuading Democrats to stand with the deal. Namely, the Republican Party.
In short, he claims the GOP refusal to compromise is a prime factor in Democratic cohesion. Since no compromise is possible, an all-or-nothing game inevitably follows, and in the case of Democrats prevailing (as they did with this deal and the passage of the ACA in 2010) the GOP walks away with little more than recriminations.

I'm not convinced he's right on all counts, but there are enough examples over the past 6 years to make this a credible theory.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

A Matter of Confession

Roger Ebert has an interesting essay on confessions, using the the late Secretary of Defense during Viet Nam Robert S. McNamara's comments as a starting point. I thought this paragraph was particularly astute.

Roger Ebert's Journal: Archives
He agreed to submit himself to Morris's questions for an hour. He ended by speaking for ten. He went to subjects Morris might not have thought to take him, discussed things that were, at 85, much on his mind. He was a key aide to Gen. Curtis LeMay, who directed the fire-bombing of Tokyo when more than 100,000, mostly civilians, were burned alive. After the war, he says, in one of the film's most astonishing moments, LeMay observed to him that if America had lost, they would have been tried as war criminals. What does he, McNamara, think about the bombing? By quoting LeMay's statement that might have forever gone unrecorded, I think he lets us know.




Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

This Is Really Surprising

Top Stories: | obama, campaign, area : Gazette.com
Even in an area dominated by Republicans, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama has raised tens of thousands of dollars more than Sen. John McCain, a Gazette analysis of campaign finance records found.
Obama's money advantage in the Colorado Springs area is insignificant in the context of a record-breaking season for campaign spending, but any edge for a Democratic Party presidential candidate is a dramatic shift from historical trends.
Four years ago, President Bush's contributions from the Colorado Springs area were three times that of his rival, Sen. John Kerry. An edge for Obama is also the last thing many observers would expect from an area where registered Republicans outnumber Democrats 2 to 1.
As of the end of August, Obama brought in $265,920 in donations from the city and surrounding areas, compared to McCain's $202,626.
In a county that hosts more evangelical organizations than any other in America, including Focus on the Family, a Democrat beating a Republican in campaign donations must herald the millennium.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Why do so many media conservatives, like Mona Charen, sound so depressed these days? Mona's lament on NRO is well nigh pathetic.

All of a sudden, this election is shaping up as a verdict on capitalism. The Obama campaign wanted it to be about George W. Bush. The McCain campaign wanted it to be about character. But instead, because the markets are shooting off in all directions like bullets from a dropped pistol, the stakes have suddenly been raised dramatically.

We are in the midst of the worst panic in history, it’s true (because it is global). . . historian John Steele Gordon . . .  believes more sensible banking policy would prevent future panics. But if we elect a crypto-socialist like Barack Obama and give him a bigger Democrat majority in the House and a filibuster-proof Senate, banking regulation may be the least of our troubles.
No matter how much real wealth is evaporating before our very eyes, a Democratic Administration could be worse? It's symptomatic of the disarray of the once-formidable GOP - there's a missing subtext now, and in a campaign frenzy Dems and Republicans alike will inevitably say some batshit-crazy stuff. Used to be, though, that the Rs always kicked ass on Ds. It's always hard to say, but it sure feels like a change in the wind.

Three weeks to go. Then poor Mona can take a few days off and recover.

Sunday, March 16, 2008

The Perils of Friends with Imaginary Friends

Now that lots of buzz has been generated by Rev. Jeremiah Wright's positions ("Hillary is not a black man!") maybe it's a good time to recall my favorite debate, the Values Voter confab held last fall in Florida. A series of high profile Republicans stood up in public and claimed to have an invisible friend, one that qualified each candidate to run the most powerful country in the world.



From my point of view, once a person admits to imaginary friends, we shouldn't be surprised at any nonsense that follows. Fortunately, most people are middling faithful to their theology, if any, and therefore what happens in church stays in church. Religion is, I think, largely irrelevant, especially in public life.

Creative Commons